Skip to content
OQAM
Menu

AnalysisMercurius Credit FundChristian Hjalmarsson, Lead portfolio manager

Where did the risk premia go?

Ten years of issuance data show that compensation for additional credit risk has fallen to historic lows in several segments. We examine current pricing and how we seek value in this market.

The major Swedish banks are issuing Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds at spreads around 100 basis points below their ten-year average. In May, a BB-rated property company’s hybrid bond was priced at a lower credit spread than the same company’s senior bond in the zero interest rate environment of 2021.

These examples highlight a defining feature of this credit cycle: the additional compensation investors receive for taking more risk is historically low, whether that risk comes from lower credit quality or a more junior position in the capital structure.

A decade of issuance

Our analysis covers the Nordic primary market from 2015 onwards. What stands out is the extent of spread compression: investors are receiving less additional compensation for taking more risk.

Issuance spreads for bank AT1 bonds are around 211 basis points, compared with a ten-year average of approximately 320 basis points. Investors are therefore accepting historically low credit spreads on the most subordinated bank debt.

Bank AT1 spreads at historically low levels

AT1 and T2 issuance spreads and annual means, basis points

Source: OQAM.

At the same time, the base rate accounts for a historically large share of returns. In our analysis, three-month Stibor contributes approximately half of the expected return, with the credit spread contributing the other half. This changes the relationship between return and risk: a higher overall coupon does not necessarily mean better compensation for credit risk itself.

The base rate accounts for more of the return

Coupon split between credit spread and three-month Stibor, basis points

Source: OQAM.

A narrower gap between BB and BBB in the property sector

In the property sector, the spread premium for moving from investment grade to high yield is at its lowest over the period studied. The gap between BB and BBB is around 133 basis points. The gap between A− and BBB, by contrast, is around 41 basis points, close to its historical average.

A narrower BB–BBB gap in property bonds

Issuance spread differentials between credit ratings, basis points

Source: OQAM.

This comes at a time when property companies’ shares trade well below net asset value. The narrowing spread differential between stronger and weaker credits therefore warrants close examination.

Stendörren’s new hybrid bond illustrates the point. It was priced at Stibor plus 375 basis points, compared with Stibor plus 390 basis points for the company’s senior issue in 2021. The hybrid is more deeply subordinated and has equity-like features, yet its credit spread was lower than that of the earlier senior issue. Meanwhile, the company’s share price had fallen by around 40 % since the 2021 issue.

Property hybrid bonds versus senior debt

BB-rated property companies: hybrid issues and senior spread trend, basis points

Source: OQAM.

How we seek value

In this market, we see value in three areas: rigorous company analysis; relative value trades between issuers and across the capital structure when pricing diverges from historical relationships; and a fund structure that allows us to act when opportunities arise.

In May, we reduced our exposure to bank Tier 2 (T2) bonds and increased our holdings of senior corporate bonds with higher credit ratings, including A-rated EQT, alongside Thule and Sobi. We also added to several core holdings that continued to perform well following strong quarterly results.

The fund’s concentrated portfolio gives these decisions a meaningful impact on performance. This is how we pursue our target return of three-month Stibor plus 300 basis points, even when coupon income alone is insufficient.

Returns above the portfolio’s credit spread

Rolling twelve-month excess return over Stibor and credit spread, basis points

Source: OQAM.

The fund’s performance in May

Mercurius Credit Fund returned +0.70 % in May, taking its year-to-date return to +2.08 % and its trailing twelve-month return to +4.74 %. Volatility since inception stands at 1.42 %.

Please contact me or Andreas Olsson if you would like to receive the monthly report, available in Swedish, or discuss our approach to the credit market.

Also published on LinkedIn on June 2, 2026. See the post opens in a new tab · Follow OQAM on LinkedIn opens in a new tab

Marketing communication. This article does not constitute investment research. It has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The views expressed are those held at the time of publication, may change without notice and do not constitute investment advice. Fund returns relate to share class A, are net of fees and are not adjusted for inflation. The fund was launched on 2023-07-07. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. The value of an investment in the fund can fall as well as rise, and you may not get back the full amount invested. Mercurius Credit Fund is a Swedish special fund with FCG Fonder AB as alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) and OQAM AB as portfolio manager. The key information document and information brochure are available on the fund page. For further details, see Important information.